Gnashing of Teeth About Qualifications of Military Officers
A recent article in POLITICO noted “(General) Kelly’s military background raises interesting questions for his leadership of the department, said one former DHS official. Kelly joins a bevy of other military officials as picks for jobs in the incoming administration, from retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser to retired Gen. Jim Mattis as Defense secretary.”
Indeed, it raises interesting questions for us to think about. Why does a community organizer without real experience become President of the United States and appoint lawyers, scientists, activists, and professional politicians to become heads of federal departments, bureaus and agencies and not be criticized about their competence? Why does an experienced business professional get elected President and face criticism for hiring retired military officers who have managed complex operations and led large formations of diverse personnel in life and death situations? Think about the contrast of leadership at the top of government.
Statements of concern for the political appointment of retired military officers reinforce the growing divide between military service and the civilian population at large. It’s a well-known fact that less than one percent of the entire U.S. population serves in the military (active, Guard and Reserve). Unlike earlier generations in America, the normal path to political office does not ordinarily run through a term of service with the military. Yet, throughout our nation’s history, we have seen many of our most distinguished political figures with military service on their resume. Why is that?
Unlike much of the civilian sector, the military is a meritocracy. The higher you go, the fewer the slots, the more competitive. No unions to protect the weak, shiftless, or lazy. You’re either up to the task or you’re not. Unfortunately, most civilians are clueless about the demands, challenges and rigors of military service. They only know what they read in the newspaper and books, see on TV, and watch in the movies. There’s a big difference between an “armchair” general and a real general.
I assist retired and former military men and women with their transition to find meaningful leadership jobs in the private sector. I’m routinely having to explain to business leaders who are unaware of the high levels of education, training, skills and experience of military professionals. Not only do I coach and mentor my clients (retired, separated and former military personnel), I also spend time with presidents, CEOs and business owners explaining the value of hiring these well-educated, adaptive, and innovative leaders. The feedback I receive when they hire a veteran is always positive.
Wake up America! Placing these military leaders in charge of federal departments is more likely to lead to better accountability and improved efficiency. Our President-elect knows something that the American people have already figured out. Hiring a veteran is good for you, good for your business, and good for America. That includes our government.